This list is meant to serve as a companion guide to the articles I’ve written exposing the tactics of Vani Hari (aka the Food Babe). It’s a list of over 610 products, vendors, and brand names that Hari’s targeted so far. When you misrepresent the “dangers” of a product, then recommend an alternative for which you receive a sales commission–there’s a problem…
In addition to this list, you may also be interested in knowing that many of the products sold by Food Babe have the very same ingredients she says are dangerous. For example, she sells a full line of products containing the same dyes over which she lambasts Weight Watchers, Kraft, and McDonald’s. She’s sold BHT for nearly 3 years, all the while harassing Kellogg’s and General Mills over the same (safe) additive. The Babe doesn’t like agave nectar, but she’s happy to sell you a full range of foods sweetened with–you guessed it–agave nectar. And don’t even get me started on cellulose. A special series on Food Babe’s hypocrisy can be found here.
Without further ado then, here’s the Food Babe Ban List:
A1 Steak Sauce
AeroMed Oral Glucose
Airport food (almost all)
Alpen Gold (Kraft)
Alta Dena (butter)
AMP Energy (Pepsico)
Amy & Brian
Apple Cinnamon Cheerios
Arnold Baker Light 100% Whole Wheat Bread
Artificial coloring (any product containing)
Artificial flavoring (any product containing)
Atkin’s (protein shakes)
Azodicarbonamide (a safe bread ingredient)
Baby Formula (most, containing safe GMO corn syrup)
Back to Nature
Baking powder (non-GMO)
Barley malt (any product containing)
BASF (Prop 37)
Bayer (Prop 37)
Beet sugar (any product containing)
Ben & Jerry’s (Prop 37)
Big Gulp (7-11)
Birthday Cakes (all from supermarkets)
Blue No. 1 (food dye)
Blue Diamond Almond Breeze
Bread (almost all packaged bread)
Bright Beginning Baby Formula
Brown sugar (any product containing)
Bunge (Prop 37)
Buttered syrup (any product containing)
California Pizza Kitchen
Canola (rapeseed, non-GMO)
Canola seed oil (non-GMO)
Cascadian Farm (Prop 37)
Castoreum flavoring (do you eat beaver butt?)
Cetaphil Facial Cleanser
C. H. Guenther & Son (Prop 37)
Charles Shaw Wine (2 Buck Chuck)
Cheese (all conventional American cows’)
Cinnamon Toast Crunch
Citric Acid (non-GMO)
Cobalamin (Vitamin B12, non-GMO)
Con Agra Foods
Condensed Milk (non-GMO)
Confectioners Sugar (non-GMO)
Corn, all, in restaurants (non-GMO)
Corn Flour (non-GMO)
Corn Masa (non-GMO)
Corn Meal (non-GMO)
Corn Oil (non-GMO)
Corn Sugar (non-GMO)
Corn Syrup (any product containing)
Corn Syrup, High Fructose
Corn Tortillas (non-GMO)
Cosmetics from drug stores
Costco (cakes, microwave popcorn)
Cottonseed oil, all, in restaurants (non-GMO)
Country Crock Butter
Cracklin’ Oat Brand
Crisco Canola Oil
Crisco Natural Cooking Oil
Crop Life (Prop 37)
Crunch Nut (Kellogg)
Dairy (all conventional American cow’s milk and cheese)
Dasani (Coca Cola)
Deodorants (all aluminum-containing)
Dextran/Dextrin [sic] (any product containing)
Dextrose, all (I kid you not–see the Stevia article)
Diastase (any product containing)
Diastatic malt (any product containing)
Diet Mountain Dew
Diet Soft Drinks
Double Gulp (7-11)
Dreyer’s Ice Cream
E951 (sweetener, U.K. & Europe)
Earth’s Best (baby formula)
Eggs (all, from fast food restaurants)
Ethyl maltol (any product containing)
Evian (Coca Cola)
Famous Amos (Kellogg)
Fantastic World Foods
Flu Shots (very dangerous to skip this one!)
Food and Drug Administration, U.S. (FDA approved ingredients)
Food Starch (non-GMO)
Fresh Market (cakes)
Frosted Mini Wheats
Fructose (any product containing)
Fruit, from concentrate
Fruit By The Foot
Garden of Eatin’
General Food International (General Foods)
Girl Scout Cookies
Glucose (any product containing)
Glutamic Acid (non-GMO)
Gluten (for non-celiac disease sufferers, a safe protein found in wheat, barley, and rye)
GMO Foods (inc. corn, soy, cotton, canola)
Hall’s Cough Drops
Haribo (gummy bear manufacturer)
Harris Teeter Cakes
Hawaiian Tropic Sunscreen
Heinz Tomato Ketchup
Hello Kitty popsicles
Herbal Essence Shampoo
Hero (Prop 37)
HFCS-90 (ingredient, High fructose corn syrup)
Hidden Valley Ranch (salad dressing)
High Fructose Corn Syrup (HFCS)
Honey Graham Oh’s
Honey Nut Cheerios
Hope in a Jar
Hot Tamales (candy)
Hydrogenated Starch (non-GMO)
Hydrolyzed Vegetable Protein (non-GMO)
I Can’t Believe It’s Not Butter!
Idahoan (Prop 37)
Inventure Foods (Prop 37)
Inverse Syrup (non-GMO)
Invert sugar (any food containing)
Jack in the Box
Jason’s Deli Ice Cream
Jason’s Deli Dressings
Jason’s Deli Meats
Jason’s Deli Muffins
Jason’s Deli Soups
Juice, Fruit (nearly all processed)
KFC (Kentucky Fried Chicken)
Kraft (not just Mac & Cheese!)
Lactic Acid (non-GMO)
Lactose (any food containing)
Lay’s Potato Chips
Malic acid (non-GMO)
Malitol (any product containing)
Malt Extract (non-GMO)
Malt syrup (any product containing)
Maltodextrin (any product containing)
Maltose (any product containing)
Mannitol (any product containing)
Martin’s Potato Rolls
Maseca Corn Flour
Mazola Corn Plus
Mazola Vegetable Plus
McCormick Seasonings, Spices, etc.
Meat (ALL conventional, non-organic)
Menchies Frozen Yogurt
Mellow Mushroom Pizza
Mexican Restaurants (most–I’m not kidding)
Microwave ovens, all (watch out for those Hitler crystals! 😉
Mighty Leaf (tea)
Milk (all American non-organic, pasteurized)
Milk (condensed, non-GMO)
Milk Powder (non-GMO)
Milo Starch (non-GMO)
Miss Vickie’s (Pepsico)
Mission White Corn Tortillas
Modified Food Starch (non-GMO)
Modified Starch (non-GMO)
Moe’s Southwest Grill
MUG Root Beer
Muir Glen (Prop 37)
Multi Grain Cheerios
Nanoparticles (ingredient, especially yogurt)
Nestle (virtually all products)
Newman’s Own (popcorn)
Nice! Oats & Honey
Old El Paso
Oleic Acid (non-GMO)
O.N.E Coconut Water
Organic Valley (butter)
Oxybenzone (sunscreen component)
Pacific Foods aka Pacific Natural Foods
Papayas, all from Hawaii
Parent’s Choice Organic (baby formula)
Pediasure (via “Moms Across America/Glyphosate article)
Pears from concentrate
Phosphoric acid (ingredient)
Phytic Acid (non-GMO)
Pickles and Relish (any that contain food dye)
Pinkberry Frozen Yogurt
Popsicle brand popsicles
Potassium sorbate (ingredient)
Promise Me (Susan G. Komen perfume)
Protein Isolate (non-GMO)
Rapeseed (aka canola, non-GMO)
Raw sugar (any product containing)
Red No. 40 (food dye)
Red Mango Frozen Yogurt
Refiner’s syrup (any product containing)
Reilly Food Company
Republic of Tea
Retinyl Palmitate (Vitamin A, found in sunscreens and lotions)
Richelieu Foods (Prop 37)
Round Table Pizza
R.W. Knudsen (Prop 37)
Safeway (poultry, Prop 37)
Salad dressings (most, with “GMO oils”)
Santa Cruz Organic
Sausages (with nitrates)
Seattle’s Best Coffee (Pepsico)
Silk & Horizon
Silk Soy Milk
Smartwater (Coca Cola)
Smart Balance (butter)
Smithfield (Prop 37)
Snyder’s of Hanover
Sodium benzoate (ingredient)
Sodium citrate (non-GMO)
Soft Drinks (almost all)
Solae (Prop 37)
Sorbitol (any product containing)
Soy, all in restaurants (non-GMO)
Soybean Oil (any product containing)
Soy Flour (non-GMO)
Soy Isolates (non-GMO)
Soy Lechitin (non-GMO)
Soy Milk (non-GMO)
Soy Oil (non-GMO)
Soy Protein (non-GMO)
Soy Protein Isolate (non-GMO)
Soy Sauce (non-GMO)
SPF greater than 50 in sunscreens
Spices (Virtually all sold in the U.S.A.)
Smart Balance Cooking Oil
Sorghum syrup (any product containing)
Sour Patch Kids
Spice of Life
Stearic Acid (non-GMO)
Stevia, manufactured (see article)
Sucrose (any product containing)
Sugar (unless specified as non-GMO cane sugar)
Sulfites (ingredient, vegetable preservative)
Sunscreens, all spray (also see specific brand names)
Sunscreens, all powder (also see specific brand names)
Sunscreens, CVS brand
Sunscreens, Rite-Aid brand
Sunscreens, Walgreens brand
Super Big Gulp (7-11)
Susan G. Komen Foundation
Swanson Chicken Broth
Syngenta (Prop 37)
Teriyaki Marinades (non-GMO)
Textured Vegetable Protein (non-GMO)
Thomas’ 100% Whole Wheat English Muffins
Tocopherols (Vitamin E, non-GMO)
Trical (Prop 37)
TruMoo (Dean Foods)
Turbinado sugar (any product containing)
Twinings of London (tea)
Udi’s Gluten Free Whole Grain Bread
Unilever (Prop 37)
Uno Chicago Grill
Utz All Natural
Vegetable Fat (non-GMO)
Vegetable Oil (non-GMO)
Veggie burgers (non-organic)
Vermont Organics (baby formula)
Vie de France
Vitamin A (Retinyl Palmitate, found in sunscreens and lotions)
Vitamin B12 (Cobalamin, non-GMO)
Vitamin E (Tocopherol, non-GMO)
VitaminEnergy (Coca Cola)
Vitamin Water Zero
Walmart (I kid you not! They’re selling GMO products!)
Whey Powder (non-GMO)
While Lily Flour
Whole Foods (Even she doesn’t understand her do’s and don’ts–see her article!)
Whole Foods Organic Baby Formula
Xanthan Gum (non-GMO)
Yellow No. 5 (food dye)
Yellow sugar (any product containing)
Yoforia Frozen Yogurt
Yves Veggie Cuisine
Zicam Cherry Cold Remedy
Zico Coconut Water
Please note: to avoid increasing search engine exposure for quack web sites, I use the DoNotLink service to obfuscate URLs. I promise you are not being redirected to porn 😉
Food Babe: Processed To Death (Cooking Oils)
Food Babe: GMO Ingredients A-Z Reference
Food Babe: GMO Ingredients in General Mills Foods
Food Babe: “Recipe for a Heart Attack”
Food Babe: Why aren’t you making your own hummus?
Food Babe: Artificial Dyes
Food Babe: Read the Ingredients List
Food Babe Avoid These When Eating Out
Food Babe: Olive Oil Archives
Food Babe: Sugar Archives
Food Babe: Dead Animal Parts in V8, Prego, Swanson, Campbell’s
Food Babe Heinz
Food Babe: “Carrots soaked in chlorine”
Food Babe Microwave Ovens
Food Babe Beauty Products
Food Babe “GMO” Candy
Food Babe Cetaphil
Food Babe Oreos
Food Babe: Parabens
Food Babe Mrs. Dash
Food Babe: Companies Fighting Prop 37
Food Babe Susan G. Komen & Other Cancer Organizations
Food Babe Flu Shot Nonsense
Food Babe Kleenex
Food Babe Truvia, Stevia
Food Babe Sunscreens
Food Babe “Just Say No” to Candy
Food Babe Fair Life
Food Babe Salmon
Food Babe Chocolates
Food Babe Whole Foods (She’s really confused on this one!)
Food Babe Peanut Butter
Food Babe Toothpastes
For Babe Birthday Cake
Food Babe Thanksgiving Scrooge
Food Babe Protein Shakes
Food Babe Spices
Food Babe Banned Holiday Gifts
Food Babe “GMO Wheat”
Food Babe Milk, Dairy Products
Food Babe Baby Formula
Food Babe Non-Organic Meat
Food Babe Double Standard
Food Babe Ractopamine
Food Babe Trader Joes
Food Babe Beer
Food Babe Chewing Gum
Food Babe Snacks/GMOs
Food Babe Burgers
Food Babe Silly Putty
Food Babe Microwave Popcorn
Food Babe Deodorants
Food Babe How to Ruin Oatmeal
Food Babe Coconut Water
Food Babe Juices
Food Babe Natural Flavors
Food Babe General Mills
Food Babe Soft Drinks
Food Babe “Toxic” drink
Foodbabe Scare Tactics
Food Babe Mexican Pizza
Food Babe Pizza
Food Babe Jello
Food Babe Medicine Misinformation
Food Babe GMO Natural Products
Food Babe Pepperidge Farm
Food Babe Cereal
Food Babe GMO Archives
Food Babe Butter
Food Babe Jason’s Deli
Food Babe Bread
Food Babe Never Buy!
Food Babe Tea
Food Babe Frozen Yogurt
Thanks for the list, I didn’t realize there was so much to choose from!
***no need to post next bit of info***
I was wondering why this entry wasn’t appearing in the reader. I happened to notice that you’ve used more than 15 tags, which to my understanding, posts using more than 15 will not appear in the reader. Just FYI.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for the info on tags Occraz. I didn’t realize there was a limit and I need to revisit the post.
Yes, there is a lot to choose from. I’m stunned by how many companies/products Vani Hari has defamed, and how blatantly she is pushing alternative products for which she’s receiving a commission. The fact that she has so many followers shows just how gullible people can be. And here you and I chose to make an honest living 😦
LikeLiked by 3 people
Are you counting food babes money or do you have a substantial reason to consume the products on food babes banned list? Or, both?
Have you a superior dietary system or formula? Without a substantial solutions to the poor nutritional products on market shelves and restaurant tables, even your emoji humour can’t keep you from looking like a “gatekeeper”.
I’m pointing out that Food Babe is making a lot of money by selling products that contain the same ingredients she says are dangerous, and waiting on someone to offer an explanation. Do you have one?
Pingback: » Food Babe on alcohol, toxins and a lack of science
Pingback: » Food Babe: smart but in a different way
Pingback: » Food Babe: A different kind of smart
Pingback: Food Babe Scam: Why Vani Hari Is a Fraud | Fraud Files Forensic Accounting Blog
I’m amazed at the stupidity here…I think this is a great list of products to stay away from…if you all want to keep consuming aspartame, diet soda, artificial favors, GMOS, Burger King, dunkin donuts etc go for it… Let me know where you are at in a few years… Amazing you people will spend so much time trying to prove how good this crap is for you… If all this stuff worked wouldn’t America be the healthiest country on earth? Wake up people!
The majority of the world–including scientists–would be thrilled for any evidence at all that anything on this list is dangerous. Chemistry students know that aspartame metabolizes to the same end products as tomato and certain fruit juices; only those juices produce more (and the human body clears them away without any problems whatsoever). Basic biology would have given you the tools necessary to know that there’s nothing wrong with GMO food. And I’d love to know what’s “dangerous” about artificial flavors. Can you tell me?
I’m not suggesting that eating every meal at Burger King or other fast food joints is a good idea. But Vani Hari’s outrageous claims against these chains are ridiculous and IMHO amount to slander. Eating dinner at Burger King is not going to hurt you.
LikeLiked by 2 people
No, but eating every dinner at Burger King most certainly will kill you a lot faster.
Well I can answer your question about what’s so dangerous about artificial flavors. It’s because artificial flavors are made from inedible sources such as petroleum…per FDA rules. I don’t know about you but I really want petroleum by products in my food. And about gmo’s, there is something inherently wrong with a plant that doesn’t die when roundup is sprayed on it or corn that can produce its own pesticide. If nature intended for these things to be tinkered with then she will do it on her own. Now I don’t agree with someone trying to tell me that such and such foods are bad if they are only trying to push their own products and affiliations that contain the same ingredients.
Thanks for reading and replying. It’s actually natural flavors that Hari objects to (and sells!)
What is wrong with a plant producing is own pesticide? Caffeine is a pesticide and is, of course, produced by plants.
Nature isn’t a person that has intentions. It isn’t a he or she.
The Fallacious Argument you just used actually contains seven different Logical Fallacies in total and will list them for you now. You basically ranted out a feeling you have based on an uniformed opinion.
“I’m amazed at the stupidity here” (Ad Hominem or Argument to the Man)
“I think this is a great list of products to stay away from” (Argument From False Authority:)
“if you all want to keep consuming aspartame, diet soda, artificial favors, GMOS, Burger King, dunkin donuts etc go for it” (Reifying and
“Let me know where you are at in a few years” (Needling)
“Amazing you people will spend so much time trying to prove how good this crap is for you…” (Argument From Personal Astonishment)
“If all this stuff worked wouldn’t America be the healthiest country on earth? Wake up people!” (Hypothesis Contrary To Fact and Complex Question (Tying) plus Causal Reductionism (Complex Cause).
So you should really try and ask a new question, as that…wasn’t. Anyway, despite the food babes advice, I will take “dihydrogen monoxide” (DHMO) every day and be healthier than you. Sorry you think we should not take that stuff but after so many years, I need it. You should research it before banning it or avoiding it altogether.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seriously? No issues with GMO’s? http://foodrevolution.org/blog/former-pro-gmo-scientist/
Artificial Flavors…how about just because they are a chemical? What do you attribute Americas poor health to be from, if we have the best science on earth?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Scott, do you realize your aspartame article doesn’t contain a single scientific scholarly reference? Not one! I read it several times. Would you please read it again and point out any that I might have missed?
Just to give you an idea of where I’m coming from, I could sit down and write an article just as long as he aspartame silliness, claiming that breathing was bad for you. I’d have just as much evidence for breathing vs. aspartame.
Honestly sir, all you’ve given me are paragraphs of scare tactics. Again, do you have any peer-reviewed scientific studies showing conclusively that aspartame is dangerous?
I’d like to ask for the same for GMOs. The article you linked is just an interview with a disaffected doctor. I appreciate the time you’ve taken to read and respond. My hope is that you would spend time some reading some GMO material from a reputable source (such as the USDA) and bone up on your basic biology and genetics before coming to a conclusion. Looking at what you’ve submitted… this just is not in line with what’s known about genetic engineering.
LikeLiked by 3 people
How about you show me your peer reviewed articles that claim aspartame isn’t dangerous? Even peer reviewed articles have been found to include falsified information. This is about more than the fear of Gmo’s and aspartame. Scare tactics, or not, we are all entitled to know what ingredients are in our food products and I’ll choose which ones I’m willing to consume. We don’t need people like you bashing on people for their ideals.
You’re certainly entitled to know what’s in the food, but your right to free speech does not include lying about health dangers that aren’t there. I’m constantly amazed by those who seem to believe freedom of speech works in one direction. Sorry, but if you’re going to make the claim that something is dangerous, the burden of proof is on you. This is a basic scientific concept that seems lost on the pseudoscience crowd. If you’re going to claim aspartame is dangerous, show me the peer reviewed scientific evidence. Or don’t make the claim. If you do make the claim, you’ll be called out on it.
LikeLiked by 4 people
P.S. Regarding this: “Artificial Flavors…how about just because they are a chemical?”
Scott, every single thing you put into your body is a chemical. Whether you’re a vegan, vegetarian, have a seat of honor at Burger King, or fall somewhere in between, EVERY. SINGLE. THING. you ingest is a chemical. All of the food. All of the water. They’re all chemicals.
Where they “came from” does not matter. It doesn’t make them “dangerous” or “not dangerous”. This is why and so many others are fighting so hard for good science education in our schools. If these points where understood, so little time would be spent on these type of arguments.
LikeLiked by 3 people
Do you realize how ridiculous that argument was? And to finish with “good science education” is particularly amusing. Maybe if you had had some “good science education”, we wouldn’t need to be having this debate right now.
My science education is actually very good Lazzeia. Part of that includes admitting I’m wrong when I’ve been proven wrong. So if there is a particular fact (or set of them) you disagree with, please do present them and let’s debate. I’m sorry, but all I see in the comment I’m replying to is a veiled ad hom attack. Not very scientific!
So, please, what do you disagree with and what are your facts? Let’s debate.
LikeLiked by 3 people
I love how you conveniently shy away from the big picture…if science is so fantastic and the USDA and FDA are so trustworthy why isn’t America the healthiest nation in the world?
We are 5% of the worlds population and consume 50% of the worlds drugs and 80% of the worlds psychiatric drugs…and are one of the most unhealthy nations on the planet.
I had aspartame poisoning, suffered from depression and migraines….as soon as I stopped they went away. Have eliminated my arthritis naturally by eliminating inflammation causing chemicals from my diet and using baking soda, lemon cherries and Honey, cured my mother in law from stage 4 breast cancer with doctors claiming she was going to die in 3 months by eliminating, sugar, wheat, increasing vitamin D, magnesium, and other supplements severely lacking from all the crap in the American food system. I don’t need a scientific study on some isolated chemical, I believe the scientific evidence conveniently being overlooked shows that holistically the toxins in our food and water supply are wreaking havoc on America.
Aren’t we told the sun is dangerous, supplements are useless, you can overdose on vitamins, etc? Follow the trail of money, you can’t make money with baking soda and lemon so that will be swept under the rug and some pharmaceutical drug with 50 different side effects is the only possible solution… Really? I don’t think I’m the fear mongerer, sir I believe you are. Connect the dots, follow the money and explain to me why America is one of the most unhealthy countries on the planet? It’s a simple question with a simple answer…we are being poisoned for monetary gain… There are places on earth where people live longer lives then in America without chronic pain, disease, obesity and heart disease…and oh, by the way don’t follow what the American government agencies, pharmaceutical companies, and scientists claim to be safe…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sorry if it appeared I was shying away from anything. I’m always open to learning new things and am willing to admit when I’m wrong. I DON’T, however, accept FOX news and other such rags as news sources. I know our cancer research in particular is outstripping other countries because I just researched it–and can back the claim with *scholarly* (peer-reviewed) sources. In other words, not just some people making loud claims in a right-leading politically motivated newspaper.
Seriously, all of the “he said, she said, they said” rampant in your comments… they don’t mean anything. Not to a scientist. I know for a fact we are NOT one of the most unhealthy countries–though we CERTAINLY could be doing better.
We could use science to do better. We could be teaching people about the dangers of truly bad food they’re eating, and about how overeating is such a bad thing! We could also be teaching that GMO food isn’t bad. We could be teaching people to get vaccinated and cut down on the number of little typhoid mary’s running around in our schools. We could cut down harder on cigarette smokers. We could tightly regulate woo spreaders like the homeopathics–you cannot make claims about efficacy unless it’s demonstrated in clinical trials.
Yeah, if we listened hard to SCIENCE, we could become a safer country.
LikeLiked by 2 people
“Seriously, all of the “he said, she said, they said” rampant in your comments… they don’t mean anything. Not to a scientist.”
Then why on earth do you lot emphasize “peer reviewed data”? You seem to worship it, and at the end of the day, it’s a lot of “he said, she said” business too. Scientists are humans. They have human biases. They are not super-human beings who cannot be influenced and are some kind of ultimate authority, and to claim so is insulting to people’s intelligence, and absolutely ridiculous.
Cocaine was also hailed as a miracle drug — before it was found to be dangerous. Right now, we’re living in an age that has commoditized human health. There is no money in keeping a population healthy. Keep that in mind.
Yeah, if the SCIENCE industry wasn’t as corrupt and as polluted by industry as it is; and if the FDA, USDA and EPA actually followed their mission statements and protected the health of the general American populace instead of pocketing corporate dollars, we could become a safer country. You’re the shill, my friend. And you’re probably not even getting paid for it. Or are you?
So you’re trying to combat science with conspiracy theories Laezza?
LikeLiked by 2 people
“We could tightly regulate woo spreaders like the homeopathics–you cannot make claims about efficacy unless it’s demonstrated in clinical trials”. Wouldn’t a better name instead of woo spreader be profit blocker? I’m sure a big pharma company is going to spend money showing baking soda is better then chemo because they have my best interest at heart…right, a $3 box of baking soda vs $2000 chemo treatments? You said you are open to learning? Follow the money…which one do you think they are going to disprove or ignore?
I’m sure you will doubt this study for some reason…
However I have the proof of watching it work for my mother in law…the regimen outlined in the bottom of this article… No chemo…stage 4 – 3 months to live…completely reversed…
Or how about Celebrex prescribed for my arthritis..that’s been through clinical trials right? The following side effects are acceptable?
WARNINGS AND PRECAUTIONS————————-
Seriousandpotentiallyfatalcardiovascular(CV)thromboticevents, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Patients with known CV disease/risk factors may be at greater risk (5.1, 14.6, 17.2).
Seriousgastrointestinal(GI)adverseevents,whichcanbefatal. The risk is greater in patients with a prior history of ulcer disease or GI bleeding, and in patients at high risk for GI events, especially the elderly. CELEBREX should be used with caution in these patients (5.4, 8.5, 14.6, 17.3).
Elevatedliverenzymesand,rarely,severehepaticreactions. Discontinue use of CELEBREX immediately if abnormal liver enzymes persist or worsen (5.5, 17.4).
New onset or worsening of hypertension. Blood pressure should be monitored closely during treatment with CELEBREX
(5.2, 7.4, 17.2).
Fluid retention and edema. CELEBREX should be used with caution in patients with fluid retention or heart failure (5.3, 17.6).
Renalpapillarynecrosisandotherrenalinjurywithlongtermuse. Use CELEBREX with caution in the elderly, those with impaired renal function, heart failure, liver dysfunction, and those taking diuretics, ACE-inhibitors, or angiotensin II antagonists (5.6, 7.4, 8.7, 17.6).
Anaphylactoid reactions. Do not use CELEBREX in patients with the aspirin triad (5.7, 10, 17.7).
Seriousskinadverseeventssuchasexfoliativedermatitis, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), which can be fatal and can occur without warning even without known prior sulfa allergy. Discontinue CELEBREX at first appearance of rash or skin reactions (5.8, 17.5).
But foolishly I decided to up my vitamin D, magnesium and vitamin A levels, while starting a regimen of cherries, raw honey and cinnamon, based on recommendations from one of the top 10 woo spreaders in the world that I work with and lo and behold, my arthritis is gone… Doctor who prescribed Celebrixs comment… I’ve never seen anything like this…. Hmmmmmmmmmmm
So much scientific proof exists that science is not better then nature…but there’s no profit in what nature can provide, of course big pharma is going to demand clinical studies, and bend the evidence to be profitable for them at the expense of you and I…
I would love to see proof of where America is really leading in world health…and cancer research…because of our amazing science…and who that study is funded by…to the most casual observer walking around a mall or public place I see most people in fairly poor health…but maybe my standards are different…
I went as far as the first “study”, Scott. “fungal colonies and cancer colonies being the same thing?” Absolutely, utterly, ridiculous. Cancer isn’t a single disease with a single cause. I sincerely hope that if the man making this claim does have a medical license that it’s stripped immediately. It just isn’t true.
I’m glad your mother-in-law underwent natural remission. I’ve watched too many people die from the wide array of cancers that are out there. I’ve also watched several cured by modern medicine and am glad for it. We’re in much better health now than we were even 100 years ago, thanks to modern medicine, food, and sanitation. Science has moved us forward despite those that would hold use back.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Again, I think you are conveniently missing the point of the study. There is scientific proof that the acid alkaline relationship in the body is a major factor in chronic disease. Alkalinity comes from reduced toxicity, which directly comes from a more natural approach and consumption of things aligned to what nourishes the body. Baking soda alkalizes the body. Because of the profit motive by big pharma this is not studied or made mainstream because big pharma can’t profit so it gets pushed aside as in your terms by woo Sayers…
When was the last time you saw lemon water described with 15 different disclaimers about the harmful effects it may cause… Never…but you can attack someone like food babe because she has some details incorrect but overall is trying to bring awareness to better choices. And oh my gosh yes trying to earn a living from doing so…how vile! But you will steadfastly support and defend companies pushing toxic cocktails like Celebrix, Viagra, and other drugs that have potential life altering side effects and are solely focused on profiting from the pain and chronic illness of its users. How this makes sense to you is beyond belief!
And yet again how you think America is becoming more healthy is rediculous…the toxicity in our food supply is insane. If you believe everything is so safe that the FDA claims is safe why don’t you eat pop tarts and only drink diet soda for 30 days and let me know how you fare… They are safe right? If you aren’t willing then you know you will not emerge more healthy then when you started and thus by default are admitting that these “foods” are not safe… You know if you were to eat salads for 30 days you would become more healthy I would believe. No clinical study required correct? So what’s my point? If after consuming something for even one time causes a deterioration in you well being then it must be a factor in causing illness…correct? And guess what not safe… It’s pretty simple… Unfortunately the conditioned population now believes that the human body is so imperfect that it should have aches and pains and chronic illness as the body ages, and this is exactly what big pharma wants them to believe…that they get a headache because they are deficient in Tylenol… Have someone come along and say hey, you are probably just dehydrated need to drink more water and they get squashed…again…follow the money…
// When was the last time you saw lemon water described with 15 different disclaimers about the harmful effects it may cause //
Drinking too much water can be fatal: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/strange-but-true-drinking-too-much-water-can-kill/
If you go the Food Babe route with water, as she did with azodicarbonamide, which is safe to ingest but not inhale, water is toxic. According to the World Health Organization, 360,000 people died from water inhalation in 2011. This is not an exaggeration. This is exactly what Vani Hari did with Subway bread.
In all sincerity, lemon water probably doesn’t rate as many warnings because it doesn’t have much of an effect on your body–bad or good. Compare and contrast it with a wonder drug like Gleevec, which has literally saved the lives of countless people afflicted with chronic myeloid leukemia. CML was a death sentence a decade ago. Now it is now. Gleevec has unwanted side effects. Staying alive is NOT one of them. I happen to know CML patients who are very happy to accept the side effects and continue living.
As far as Food Babe “earning a living”, I think you’re missing the point. She isn’t making mistakes–she’s slandering items based on ingredients she says are dangerous while earning affiliate commissions on items with the same ingredients. For example, deodorants that contain aluminum:
LikeLiked by 2 people
Pingback: Food Babe Pushing “Dangerous” Items: Kiss My Face Moisture Shave | Bad Science Debunked
Now your just trying to be funny… Oh yes Gleevec is definitely a wonder drug! It’s a wonder it’s even legal! Cute name though!
As for azodicarbonamide…looks perfectly safe to me, funny it’s banned in many countries as a food additive but in the US it is generally recognized as safe…GENERALLY RECOGNIZED…like a Mercury filling and toxic fluride…again let’s have the public ingest more chemicals…we are doing fine, but the amazing science community is confused as to why chronic illness, autism, food allergies and obesity is on the rise…I don’t know what could it be?
As a food additive
As a food additive, azodicarbonamide is used as a flour bleaching agent and a dough conditioner. It reacts with moist flour as an oxidizing agent. The main reaction product is biurea, a derivative of urea, which is stable during baking. Secondary reaction products include semicarbazide and ethyl carbamate.
Safety and regulation
As a food additive, azodicarbonamide is not authorised for use in Australia and the European Union.:548 In the United States, azodicarbonamide has generally recognized as safe (GRAS) status and is allowed to be added to flour at levels up to 45 ppm.:548
Interesting that lemon water doesn’t have a list like Gleevec has below…but yes it is hazardous if I inhale it…thanks for pointing out that inhaling water is deadly, I think that’s called drowning right?
Let’s see, you take Gleevec and just for fun some azodicarbonamide, pop tarts, diet soda just because and I’ll drink lemon water, eat salads, supplement myself with vitamin D, vitamin A and magnesium just because and let’s see what happens after 30 days, or 90 or a year… Let me know when you want to start our “trial”. My hypothesis is I’m going to be significantly more healthy…I’m sure you would disagree because in your mind everything you defend is perfectly healthy…even though the lists of side effects is dizzying…
It’s still amazing to me you defend things like below as acceptable and attack someone like food babe… And just so I’m clear I don’t have thoughts about food babe either way other then I’m supportive of anyone who calls attention to the harm that’s being caused by poor thinking, or conditioned response and gets people to take a step back and assess what’s going on. It’s truly sad that people have become so conditioned to accept chemicals as the only solution and are being harmed with those beliefs and not awakening to the fact that science is not better then nature…
Side effects of Gleevec:
Important things to remember about the side effects of Gleevec:
Most people do not experience all of the side effects listed.
Side effects are often predictable in terms of their onset and duration.
Side effects are almost always reversible and will go away after treatment is complete.
There are many options to help minimize or prevent side effects.
There is no relationship between the presence or severity of side effects and the effectiveness of the medication.
The side effects of Gleevec and their severity depend on how much of the drug is given. In other words, high doses may produce more severe side effects.
The following side effects are common (occurring in greater than 30%) for patients taking Gleevec:
Low blood counts. Your white and red blood cells and platelets may temporarily decrease. This can put you at increased risk for infection, anemia and/or bleeding.
Nausea and vomiting
Edema (swelling of the face, feet, hands)
Muscle cramps and bone pain
Hemorrhage (see bleeding problems)
Skin rash (see skin reactions)
These side effects are less common side effects (occurring in about 10-29%) of patients receiving Gleevec:
Indigestion (see heartburn)
Shortness of breath
Night sweats (see skin reactions)
Nose bleeds (see bleeding problems)
Your fertility, meaning your ability to conceive or father a child, may be affected by Gleevec. Please discuss this issue with your health care provider.
A rare, but potentially serious side effect of Gleevec is liver toxicity. There may be elevations in transaminase, bilirubin, and lactate dehydrogenase.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The “side effect” not taking Gleevec is certain death…
LikeLiked by 1 person
The “side effect” of being an irreverent jerk is unsupportive, unsolicited comments.
I have no idea what you’re talking about Lazzeia, but that’s been the theme of the nearly dozen comments you’ve posted on my blog in the last few hours. I’ve asked you repeatedly to offer up evidence to back your views–or even PLEASE just explain what your views are–but you seem determined to throw out insults at those who disagree with you and offer up nothing else in return.
Do you *have* a scientific, logic-based position on any of the issues being discussed? If so, what is it please?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Right, let’s use another drug to cure the problems caused by all the drugs, artificial flavors, fluride, GMOS, Mercury, aspartame etc that’s deemed safe by the FDA…makes perfect sense… Because there can’t be any other way then another drug, with side effects…and that profit can be derived from… Simply amazing…
LikeLiked by 1 person
I know, right? These people don’t seem to realise that healthy people can’t be profited from. In the health industry, people are commoditized.
You’re talking about Food Babe? That woman that scares everybody off eating anything apart from the few super expensive products she “promotes” (and makes a big profit on).
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Food Babe Selling “Dangerous” Items: Tarte Blush | Bad Science Debunked
I’m not doubting that this Food Babe is cashing in on food trends, but practically everyone who has a website dreams of doing that, so you can hardly demonise her in that respect. Also, a quick read of the food list shows that Bad Science Debunked is actually promoting bad science. GMOs have not been proved safe for human consumption in non-biased, peer-reviewed studies. There aren’t any. And they’re in baby formula, along with high fructose corn syrup, which _has_ been proven to contain mercury. Please don’t ask me to procure a “source” proving mercury isn’t safe. There aren’t any studies that show that driving your car off a cliff isn’t safe, either. At any rate, she is right about all of those products. They aren’t good for you. And to say otherwise is equally irresponsible science. Making a drinking game showing your absolute contempt of her just shows how insecure and disrespectful of other humans you are. You are showing a distinct lack of humanity in the name of some kind of humour, which discredits everything else you write, and shows how non-objective you are. Have fun being consumption robots. Hope you don’t get cancer.
Thanks for reading and commenting Lazzeia. I do hope you’ll write back and address some of the real points of the game and, in general, my series of Food Babe.
First of all, she hasn’t proven anything on the list is dangerous. For example, GMOs have most definitely been shown by experts to be safe for human consumption. If you are claiming they’re dangerous (as Food Babe does), the burden of proof is on you. The world awaits.
Secondly, she is selling products with the very same ingredients as those she says is harmful. That is the real point of the game. Science clearly shows that you aren’t going to hurt yourself by using a deodorant with aluminum, which is a good thing, because Food Babe earns commissions from an aluminum-containing deodorant (https://badscidebunked.wordpress.com/2014/12/30/food-babe-pushing-dangerous-items-naturally-fresh-deodorant/).
Food Babe falsely links vitamin A to skin cancer and disparages skin products that contain the ingredient, yet she sells a wide array of products that contain–you guessed it–vitamin A. See https://badscidebunked.wordpress.com/2015/01/06/food-babe-pushing-dangerous-items-kiss-my-face-moisture-shave/ and https://badscidebunked.wordpress.com/2015/01/09/food-babe-selling-dangerous-items-tarte-blush/ for examples.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shame, there is no reply button to your rebuttals. I wonder why that is, Mark? I suggest that you add one, otherwise any kind of organized discourse and adherence to topic is impossible.
Re: conspiracy theories. You’re the one who is bringing up conspiracy theories. I mentioned nothing of the sort. What is well known and frequently in the news is the mismanagement of large government agencies such as the EPA and FDA since 2000. That is fact, not conspiracy. Don’t attempt to paint me as a conspiracy theorist, and thus discredit me.
Once you fix your commenting, then I’ll come back and we can have a discussion. But I am not entirely willing to have a discussion with a person who cannot read properly or construct logical arguments, both of which by your replies you have proven yourself unable to do.
And you referred to a “game” in one of your replies. If you think of human health as a game, then you are clearly not taking any of this seriously, and thus I am even more unwilling to engage in any kind of discourse with you.
There are already loads of data that the items on her list are dangerous. To deny this is not only foolish, but dangerous. I hope you’re getting paid a lot, because what you’re doing is most certainly unethical.
For the reply button issue, you would have to talk to WordPress, Lazzeia. They’re the ones running the web site. I’m not sure what you’re going on about though, as your replies to my replies appear as… well, replies 😉
I believe you’ve already been challenged to provide data on items in the list that are dangerous, as you and Food Babe claim. If not, I’ll invite you to do so. If you have, I’ll challenge you again. Simply claiming they’re dangerous doesn’t make it so.
And, when you’re done, we’ll come back to the point you ignored in your reply to me–she’s selling products that contain the same ingredients she says is dangerous. So, if they are as dangerous as you claim they are, why are you supporting the work of a woman who sells them.
You’ve got a lot of work ahead of you. I look forward to your reply.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: Food Babe Pushing “Dangerous” Items: Borage Therapy Dry Skin Lotion | Bad Science Debunked
How did she get such a huge following?
Pingback: Food Babe's Fear-mongering Tries to Crush Canola - Nurse Loves Farmer
Mark: Just came across this site and your series on Food Babe duplicity in the marketing of products on her site. It is astonishing to me how people can be so willingly duped and I am very thankful for someone who respects our intelligence enough to provide factual information and thoughtful analysis to understanding food constituents.
I actually like the concept of a Food Babe — someone of sufficient stature, intellect and drive to delve into all those ingredients and additives you see on packaged food items, to bring the hay down to the cows so to speak in explaining the function and source of such items and a reasoned overview of what risks, if any, such item appearing in our food presents (and any honest analysis of risks should also disclose food safety risks not addressed if you take them out) . I like the idea of someone who speaks the language of ordinary people, who understands the legitimate apprehensions of lay people who are not chemists and molecular biologists when reading hard to pronounce chemical names on a food label. Someone who is a champion and conduit for consumer empowerment through information and who can be influential in regulatory bodies and corporate boardrooms in advancing consumer interests.
But Vani Hari is a disappointment. It is not so much what she knows, but what she doesn’t know, and doesn’t even know that she doesn’t know it that makes her advice range from goofy but harmless to outright dangerous in some cases.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks for reading and commenting Rick. The solaine topic is very interesting and I’m going to have to read up on that! I did a similar writeup on caffeic acid, found in the dandelions that Hari is so in love with. Group 2B carcinogen 😉
I agree with you… it would be great if Food Babe was really interested in looking out for people. I applaud those who dedicate their time and effort to making the world safer for all of us. Vani Hari–I think obviously–is not one of them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I can believe that Food Babe intends and truly believes she is providing a socially valuable service, (although the duplicity you have pointed out in the products she promotes and receives compensation for when people buy it through her website is eroding that opinion). I think she has tapped into a natural apprehension of lay folks that are ill equipped to understand the purpose and chemistry of such things and tend to believe the safe harbor is in assuming the worst, that food companies have no motive other than to pad their bottom line and are willing to tolerate public health risks. I would even concede that in some cases, there is a germ of truth in the issues she finds with food additives. It is important that you not attack her personally, or be perceived as attacking the concept of a person taking on the role of championing the accountability of food companies to legitimate questions and uncertainties the lay public can have.
My issue with Food Babe is that she so sensationalizes everything to the point that her allegations and rhetoric far exceed the actual risk or the evidence of risk. I also perceive her to be completely oblivious to the food safety issues that were prominent in the past that many of the food production methodologies and food additives we use today address. While I might welcome the concept of a Food Babe, I still value accuracy and honesty far more than I value some agenda to pander to peoples fears and to legitimize conspiratorial nonsense. I just find Food Babe wanting in that respect, and I believe I am every bit as competent as she is in finding and interpreting relevant information and reaching my own conclusions.
If it of interest to you, I would invite you to take a look at this link [http://journalstar.com/lifestyles/food-and-cooking/ask-the-food-doc-what-are-nitrites-and-are-they/article_39c1fdb3-2075-5482-9bd5-0ee38e524924.html] to a column written by the Food Doc. He is actually a professor with the University of Nebraska who writes a column on food issues at the invitation of the local newspaper. He is not in it for celebrity or to make a buck. In the column linked to I provided as an example, he discusses the purpose of nitrites in food and what, if any, food safety issue they present. This article is full of very quality information on that topic, a very good review of the history of the use of nitrites in food preservation, what health risks they might present, what food safety risks they help consumers avoid. Overall, I found it to be a very responsible discussion of the topic, that answers the legitimate questions people might have about nitrites but which respects our intellect to convey accurate information. No alarmism, just a sober review of the matter. I would not expect the Food Babe to handle the topic with the same degree of responsibility.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Mark — One of the themes that recurs throughout this thread and indeed all across the internet is that there are no studies that prove ________________ (fill in with your favorite — gmos, aspartame, red dye #5, and whatever) are “safe.” Alternatively, we see the argument, well at one time scientists told us _____________ (smoking, ddt, agent orange, etc) was “safe” and we now know that was wrong. I think the term “safe” is such a popular word to throw around precisely because it is conveniently vague. As you have pointed out, nothing, including distilled water is “safe” if we mean that it is impossible for use of that item to ever result in a harmful outcome.
There seems to be a popular perception that there is some gold standard test that once and for all can prove “safety”, whatever that means. Scientists themselves may be unwittingly fueling this lay perception, as you often hear them say things like “scientific studies prove A is safe”, or “over 2000 studies failed to find B to be unsafe.”
I would invite your thoughts into how society could define “safe”, or whether there is a better term, to communicate to a lay audience a more sensible, rational understanding of risk, and risk tolerance. The term “safe” in my view implies a false dichotomy, that something is either completely free of free of risk or absolutely frought with risk, that there is no safe level of use or consumption.
For example, I am sure you are familiar with the Food Babe’s “shock” that doctors ask patients to drink “glucola” the common name used for the sugary drink that doctors and midwives and nurse practitioners give pregnant patients to screen for diabetes. Food Babe is appalled that the drink contains brominated vegetable oil and the high dose of sugar, and suggests that patients ask their doctor if they can substitute eating jelly beans or forgo the test altogether and follow a regimen of regular blood sugar monitoring. I don’t think anyone would claim that brominated vegetable oil (BVO) is “safe” meaning that scientists have determined that you could drink a couple pints of it a day and it would have no negative consequences to your health. However, I would say there is a very high degree of confidence, almost certainty, that the amount of BVO in the one glucola is no more exposure than if a pregnant woman drank a coke, that the odds of the amount of BVO ingested in the glucola test will have any short-term or long-term effect on health is extremely miniscule. I think it is also fair to say that the glucola test is thus far the only one shown to accurately and reliably screen for gestational diabetes, and the well known and extremely consequential risks to the mother and child of not accurately determining the absence or presence of gestational diabetes by foregoing the glucola test far outweighs the miniscule to non-existent risk of ingesting the small amount of BVO. (In my view, this isn’t just a forgivable mistake by the Food Babe. This is downright dangerous advice that would stray into medical malpractice if she were a doctor.)
Are organically grown, heirloom tomatoes “safe.” Well, we know that all tomatoes naturally contain solanine, a very acutely toxic substance to humans [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solanine] and a suspected carcinogen based on rat feeding studies. Some heirloom varieties actually contain higher amounts of solanine than modern varieties. Solanine is a fungicide and pesticide produced by nightshade species including tomatoes, potatoes, etc. and the levels produced can vary depending on growing season stresses the plants face. I don’t know that science has determined that tomatoes are “safe” to eat, if we mean that we could eat a bushel every day and not suffer solanine poisoning or any other adverse health consequence. I think eating tomatoes is “safe” in the sense that science has been able to measure solanine levels in tomatoes, to ascertain how much solanine it would take to cause health problems, and based on how many tomatoes people are likely to consume, we are very confident that the public’s use of tomatoes carries a very miniscule risk of solanine poisoning. Additionally, tomatoes are a source of many nutritionally beneficial substances, and the risks of foregoing that nutritional benefit far outweighs the risks of ingesting the solanine along with it.
Pingback: The "Food Babe" Blogger Is Full of Shit | Media Flask
Hell she’s banned a whole city; Newcastle. Is that one specific “Newcastle” or all Newcastles. Virtually every country in the world has a city whose name means “new castle”, England has two. Perhaps she means the eponymous brown ale associated with a particular Newcastle in the north of England?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: The “Food Babe” Blogger Is Full of it « Flexible Reality
Pingback: » Science Babe vs Food Babe: Facts vs Failing Grade School Science
Pingback: The “Food Babe” Blogger Is Full of Shit | James Reads
Pingback: Dear Fitness Bloggers: A Hot Body Doesn’t Make You a Health Expert | StyleCaster
Pingback: Dear Fitness Blogger: A Hot Body Doesn’t Make You a Health Expert | Fitness
Pingback: The War of Science vs. Celebrity | amycoet
Reblogged this on stacygturner.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Pingback: The “Food Babe” Blogger Is Full of Shit | Create StartUP
So, while reading this I noticed that nearly all forms of sugar were banned. No veggies or fruits for anyone according to this list. Seriously what are we supposed to eat?
I think food babe sells a sugar? 😜
Pingback: Dissecting In-N-Out Burger (Gross or Healthy? You decide!) | Re-Tales
Pingback: The “Food Babe” Blogger Is Full of Shit viral – My Blog
Pingback: The Food Babe is still full of shit. | The Truth About Vani Hari the "Food Babe"
Haribo gummies are not g.m.o. The ones from Turkey are not. The ones from Europe probably not either. Turkey banned g.m.o.